The article and lecture debate over advantages and disadvantages of smart car.The article states that smart cars ensure safe, faster and economical driving. However the professor casts doubts over these benifits and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, reading claims that smart cars ensure safe driving and they protect lives by thwrting accdidents. The professor refutes this point by saying that after all even the advanced devices often fail to carry out their task. Since, smart cars are moving together and they are tightly packed accidents rate will culminate.
Second, the article posits that with increased usage of smart cars traffic problems will vanish and individuals will be greatly benifited by the high speed feature of smart car. However the professor says that with large number of smart cars moving tightly packed, traffic conjection will occur. So, it is not possible to benifit from increased speeds. Hence, commuting hours wilol actually increase .
Third, the reading says that maintenance cost of driving would be less. The professor opposes this point by explaining that equipment used in smart cars are costlier than conventional cars. GPS system and sensor to detect how far is the next car are very expensive. In addition to this repair of the damaged cost is costly as well. So, if we combine these expenses, it will be far grater than expense of conventional cars.
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w 83
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 77
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 52
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...vantages and disadvantages of smart car.The article states that smart cars ensure s...
^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...re safe, faster and economical driving. However the professor casts doubts over these b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...by the high speed feature of smart car. However the professor says that with large numb...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ber of smart cars moving tightly packed, traffic conjection will occur. So, it is...
^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... commuting hours wilol actually increase . Third, the reading says that mainten...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, well, after all, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21145374449 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38671863095 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.379574414 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212134298593 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068817541749 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698716162183 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127696995267 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419079669019 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.