Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several

The passage presents three exciting aspects of Spartacus that make him a glorious hero. However, based on the listening, the professor admits that Spartacus indeed fight against Rome but all the stories mentioned in the passage are inaccurate.

First, the reading claims that the original goal of Spartacus is to get back home. However, the professor in the lecture contradicts what the reading states. She argues that get back home is was the only goal of Spartacus, if so, after he defeats the Rome army he could have escape rather than margin towards Rome. She thinks this is because Spartacus probably wants to conquer the whole Rome, revenge, and take up wealth.

Second, the author of the reading holds the opinion that Spartacus is a military genius that lead a poor troop to cause serious trouble to the Romans on the battlefield. But the professor in the lecture refutes this point by point out the fact that the Romans didn't take him seriously from the very beginning, they only send poorly-trained and badly-equipped soldiers. Furthermore, when Spartacus meets the best troops of Rome, he quickly loses the battle.

Finally, from the reading, we learn that Spartacus is regarded as the early human rights advocate for his fight for liberating all Roman slaves. In contrast, the listening asserts that this is not back by any serious evidence. Actually, this story was created by the people who widely practice anti-slavery. They want a character as an ancient hero to inspire people to fight again this system. So it's just a historic play created by a playwright without referencing any truth.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...g states. She argues that get back home is was the only goal of Spartacus, if so, ...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t by point out the fact that the Romans didnt take him seriously from the very beginn...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0223880597 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60443484548 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.182999756 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1428571429 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178627704117 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515220687395 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039462327319 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974860711864 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152210862501 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.