summarize the points made in the lecture about Agnostids probable living areas, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about Agnostids living place.
The reading and the lecture are both about agnostids, which were ancient extinct marine arthropod. The author of the reading believes there are several theories of how these animals lived. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. she is of the opinion that these theories have serious weaknesses.
First of all, the author suggests that agnostids were fast swimming and active predator. it is mentioned that other arthropods of that time were powerful swimmers and top predators, and so it is likely that agnostids were the same. And even though they were small animals, they could have feed on smaller organisms. The argument is refuted by the lecturer. she says other arthropods that were predators had huge eyes. On the other hand, agnostids had poor eyesights and were sometimes even blind. Furthermore, she argues that there are no evidence of other special sensory organs on them.
Secondly, the article posits that they lived on the seafloor. The article notes there are examples of other arthropods living on the seafloor, and as the same arnostids were scavangers and fed on some bacteria. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that most seafloor dwelling arthropods don't have ability to move fast. Consequently, they occupy small areas and don't spread into new territories. she elaborates on this by mentioning that agnostids were found in multiple areas and spread large distance.
Finally, it is stated that agnostids were parasites. The author establishes that there are many arthropods today are parasites, and likewise agnostids were parasites that lived on ancient fish or other larger arthropods. The lecturer, on the other hand, opposes that parasites usually don't have large population and have certain limits. The case is if too many of them are there, they would kill their host animals fast. she puts forth the idea that agnostids, however, were probably large in number because vast amount of them have been found fossilized.
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 198 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not toward enough time to help their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO30 integrated writing 70
- Professor In class today we are going to talk about grading students Before you come to class I want you to think about whether grades are beneficial On one hand they provide a way to measure students progress On the other hand some argue that grades are 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al theories of how these animals lived. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...nges the statements made by the author. she is of the opinion that these theories h...
^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...were fast swimming and active predator. it is mentioned that other arthropods of t...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...he argument is refuted by the lecturer. she says other arthropods that were predato...
^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd as the same arnostids were scavangers and fed on some bacteria. The lecturer, ...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... that most seafloor dwelling arthropods dont have ability to move fast. Consequently...
^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nsequently, they occupy small areas and dont spread into new territories. she elabor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...s and dont spread into new territories. she elaborates on this by mentioning that a...
^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er hand, opposes that parasites usually dont have large population and have certain ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rge population and have certain limits. The case is if too many of them are there, ...
^^^
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...hey would kill their host animals fast. she puts forth the idea that agnostids, how...
^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
... that agnostids, however, were probably large in number because vast amount of them have been f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 10.4613686534 249% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21943573668 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54202016719 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523510971787 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3993224367 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2857142857 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1904761905 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142024646576 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478059897039 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420774829687 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930653184186 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285152214165 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.