Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and lecture are about TED (turtle excluder device). While the reading passage states that in order to not caught turtles in nets of shrimp fishing boats TED should be used so the turtles can escape. The professor in his argument provides solutions or consequences to each of the problems mentioned in the article.
First and foremost, the reading states that turtles are rarely trapped by shrimpers. The professor solved this problem by explaining that there are thousands of boats on the United States coast that leave the coast to catch shrimps. Furthermore, if only 1 turtle is trapped per month it means 10 per year and it is a huge problem. The species of endangered turtles already have a low population that is why it is a big threat t to their population. Therefore, the professor provides a remedy to this problem.
Secondly, the text outlines that there are numerous alternative methods to protect the turtle. However, the professor mentions that the time limit can not be applied. It is effective only in theory it is impossible because there are many boats which government can not monitor or check the time on a daily basis. Moreover, it is easy to check when any boat leaves the coast it must have TED. Hence, the lecturer solved this problem.
Finally, the writer outlines that, TED is not for larger species. Nevertheless, the professor posits that the design of TEd can be modified without changing its function. As the endangered species are large and already have a little population it is necessary to protect them or they become extinct. Thus, the professor provides a long-lasting solution to this point.
It is quite visible that the author and the lecturer having trouble in finding a common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-11 | fmichela | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | Liting Mai | 75 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | kk890528 | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | easonl02526 | 71 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | alicegreen13 | 80 | view |
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 70
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation give example and support your answer 76
- summarize both passage and listening 3
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8762541806 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60320578332 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528428093645 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4717686542 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0951322000688 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298490816589 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317373958788 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531854549381 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264763397881 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.