Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture both talk about the colonization with asteroid. The author believes that this colonization option has a lot of advantages for a number of reasons. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article.
First of all, the author points out that the gravity of the asteroid which is very low. It’s also elaborated that the low gravity make spaceship to land easier and safer than landing on the earth. This point is refuted by the lecture, he says that the low gravity can cause a lot of health problem. Furthermore, he argues that the human bones and muscle density will decrease due to the low gravity. Next, the passage points out that some asteroids can become rich by transporting valuable elements and precious metals that are relatively rare on Earth, such as gold and platinum. Therefore, the asteroid colony would be extremely profitable and a good source of these raw materials. The lecture rebuts this argument. The lecturer points out that it could cost more because the transportation price will be expensive. Furthermore, he points out that it can decrease market price.
Next, the author points out that asteroids are a good option for colonization because some of them would be very easy to reach. There are a number of asteroids that periodically come within or near Earth's orbit. The lecturer against this point. He says that the earth is orbiting, so it will be difficult for them to come back when the earth is away from them.
In conclusion, the lecture and the reading are both about the colonization with asteroid. The professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | cccmmm | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | NIMA SAEEDI | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | NIMA SAEEDI | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Aydin94 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | phywhy | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture both talk ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of advantages for a number of reasons. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubt on the claims made in the article. First of all, the author points out that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut that it can decrease market price. Next, the author points out that asteroi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...back when the earth is away from them. In conclusion, the lecture and the readi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llenges the claims made in the article.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62781463302 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508960573477 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6476385538 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17217702671 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604131420305 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506946929403 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107896883456 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272852297102 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.