Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the fish farming. The author of the reading states that it has proven to be significant in economic development in various countries. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions they have negative side effect ecologically, economically and health wise too and attacks each of the claims made in the article. First, the author begin by stating that there has been evidence in numerous nation that prosper through fish farming in local as well as national level. In addition, people of these countries are no longer suffering from destitution. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that in Bangladesh although there has been increment in fish industries, poverty has not been mitigated. Thus, fish farming does not seem to be beneficial in exterminate destitutue. Secondly, according to the writing farmed fish are good for human health as they are high in vitamin b and proteins. Additional, no human has suffer from major diseases by fish consumption.The speaker on other hand points out that since people feed chemicals and unknown antibiotics for their fast growth, they are detrimental to human's health. Thus, these consuming these fish might be infectious to our health. Finally, the reading passage also notes that farmed fish preserve the wild fish by plummeting the need to catch fish as they confer renewable resources without having any harm to ambiance. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that fish stock has devastating effect on eccology. In addition, they release harmful substances and thus reduce oxygen level. As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on fish farming. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
- It is beneficial for people to spend some time living in a country where they must speak a foreign language Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nomic development in various countries. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions they ha...
^^^
Line 1, column 974, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
... and proteins. Additional, no human has suffer from major diseases by fish consumption...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1021, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...from major diseases by fish consumption.The speaker on other hand points out that s...
^^^
Line 1, column 1739, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24911032028 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73149697436 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6583027878 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9444444444 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124450256748 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378095890429 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361480060556 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124450256748 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.