Summarize the points amde in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The article discusses the Marco polo’s travel book and doubts its validity claiming that most of the events mentioned are made up. Although, the professor here contradicts it saying the travelog was made 20 years after the travel. So, there can be some mistakes but major of the events described are true.
First, the author proposes that Marco polo mentioned his close relationship with the Kublai khan, then ruler of Mongolian empire, but his governor position was not mentioned in any of their historical records. The professor believes that there are flaws in the author’s position. He contends that Marco polo’s position is misinterpreted by the English writer as he was in the ambassador position that was give to a number of people. So, his job was not worthy enough to be described in the historical texts and records.
According to writer, if he had gone to China, there would have been description of the great wall of China in his book. As it would definitely catch any traveler’s eye. The speaker, on the other hand, points out great wall of China was only made half century after Marco’s visit to guard the entry of their enemies. So, at that period of time it may be in despair or in the process of construction. So, it may not have been written in Marco’s book.
Also, the reading passage notes that Francis wood’s book mentioned the most of the Paolo’s events of the book are derived from the local libraries or from the travelers who visited Asia in the past. The professor rebuts this argument. He mentions that wood’s book also lacks validity as it has no evidence. Furthermore, the Paolo’s book has mentioned some churches of China during his visit which was nowhere mentioned in any historical records. And the archeology confirmed the existence of those churches in those areas.
In conclusion, the author and speaker have different views regarding the Marco Paolo’s travel book to China.
- Which you prefer idenpendta s early as possible or getting in touch for long time 70
- Summarize the points amde in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points amde in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree with the above statement 66
- Marco Polos s Travel book Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of the great wall of China in his book. As it would definitely catch any traveler’...
^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the entry of their enemies. So, at that period of time it may be in despair or in the process ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, then, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98765432099 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81396185907 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5374998212 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0629025299022 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199449235565 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273536156564 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0351600596513 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296292829649 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.