Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage and accompanying lecture elucidate the merits of Pterosaurs' flying power in contrast to their inability. While the reading highlights certain information indicating Pterosaurs could not fly, the lecture casts doubt upon three criticisms presented in the reading.
Primarily, the reading argues that Pterosaurs were cold-blooded animals and cold-blooded animals -due to their metabolism rate, which needs high energy for fly- could not fly. Conversely, the lecture maintains that Pterosaurs' fossils are dense and hair-covering-like for-covering. This hairy-covered style indicates that can supply enough energy for warm-blooded animals which are needed in cold climates. Thus, it suggests that it could supply enough energy for flying.
Secondly, the reading claims that Pterosaurs were large animals and due to their high body weight, they could not flap their wings for flying. The lecture, however, challenges this point, stating that there were anatomical features that able Pterosaurs' weight light for their size. Halo - light bone- could help Pterosaurs to capture their weight low despite their large body frames. Consequently, Pterosaurs could flap their wings due to the low-weight structure.
The third criticism outlined in the reading proposes that large pterosaurs would have needed big, powerful muscles in their back legs to launch themselves into the air, but based on their fossils we know that their back structure was small and weak to run fast or jump. on the other hand, the lecture delves into the bird's and Pterosaurs' limbs structure. She says that birds use their hindlimbs for walking on the ground and they have two legs. In contrast, Pterosaurs had 4 legs and they used their four limbs to push the ground to run fast and jump high enough into the air.
In conclusion, while the reading expresses reservations about Pterosaurs' fly disability, the lecture effectively refutes and counters these criticisms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...was small and weak to run fast or jump. on the other hand, the lecture delves into...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, however, second, secondly, third, thus, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52159468439 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75173332905 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538205980066 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2685082522 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896371081906 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386730770697 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366344942255 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647512452872 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047148457486 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.