Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage

The reading passage contends that there are many problems regarding the project of going to Mars. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.

First of all, the lecturer points out that it is possible to provide enough food, water, and oxygen. This is attributed to the fact that astronauts can cultivate food crops and diverse plants. In this way, they can eat them and provide enough water and fresh air. This refutes the reading passage's first point that the Mars mission is not possible without those essentials.

Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that being in low gravity environment for a long time is possible. This is because many experienced astronauts have developed techniques to adjust themselves to low gravity environment. Also, they can take diverse vitamins and calcium, which help them prevent health problems such as lower bone density and decreased muscle mass. This contradicts to the reading passage's second point that the severe low gravity environment would make the project impossible .

The final point made by the lecturer is that the space radiation can be handled. It is obvious that the radiation is not always in the dangerous levels. Therefore special instruments to detect the level of radiation and shield the radiation can be helpful for astronauts to do the Mars project. As a result, with such reasoning, the final point made in the reading passage is invalid.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-13 Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya 3 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 3 view
2022-12-10 shekoo20 80 view
2022-07-16 Braun 80 view
2022-02-28 starvingartist 3 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user JYkim :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...onment would make the project impossible . The final point made by the lecturer...
^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... is not always in the dangerous levels. Therefore special instruments to detect the level...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10878661088 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55331687875 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543933054393 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.849663955 49.2860985944 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.2142857143 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200328116872 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751828953931 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656332766967 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120483601234 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274619832214 0.0443174109184 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.