There has been discussion about the noises that sailors Russian submarines have heard during their patrolletion on the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The lecturer argues that the theories that are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author contends that these theories are refer to the sailors detections.
The first area of dispute is the theory which suggest that the noise is caused by orca whales during the courtship ritual. The professor argues that this theory may be plausible but is highly unlikely to be true because orcas live near the surface of the ocean. The noise is heard from the deep ocean.However, this directly refutes the reading passage which states that noise that sailors heard was caused by orcas when they want to attract a mate.
The second point of dispute is about the thought that the sound was caused by giant squid.
The professor argues that sailors heard these noises from the1960s and continued for 2 decades. A question is raised about the disappearance of these noises in the following years. Again,this contradicts what is stated in the reading passage that squid have a complex brain so they were able to emit sounds.
The final argument concerns the Russian submarines that picked up sounds from some military technology, like another country’s submarines that were secretly patrolling the area. The professor said that this theory doesn’t hold up because submarines can’t change direction so quickly. Also, the engines of these ships are not silence enough, the technology is not developed enough to build these quiet underwater ships. However, the text ignores these potential explanations.
Summing up, the professor presents three arguments to counter the author’s claims.
There has been discussion about the noises that sailors Russian submarines have heard during their patrolletion on the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The lecturer argues that the theories that are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author contends that these theories are refer to the sailors detections.
The first area of dispute is the theory which suggest that the noise is caused by orca whales during the courtship ritual. The professor argues that this theory may be plausible but is highly unlikely to be true because orcas live near the surface of the ocean. The noise is heard from the deep ocean.However, this directly refutes the reading passage which states that noise that sailors heard was caused by orcas when they want to attract a mate.
The second point of dispute is about the thought that the sound was caused by giant squid.
The professor argues that sailors heard these noises from the1960s and continued for 2 decades. A question is raised about the disappearance of these noises in the following years. Again,this contradicts what is stated in the reading passage that squid have a complex brain so they were able to emit sounds.
The final argument concerns the Russian submarines that picked up sounds from some military technology, like another country’s submarines that were secretly patrolling the area. The professor said that this theory doesn’t hold up because submarines can’t change direction so quickly. Also, the engines of these ships are not silence enough, the technology is not developed enough to build these quiet underwater ships. However, the text ignores these potential explanations.
Summing up, the professor presents three arguments to counter the author’s claims.
- The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremos 76
- Integrated Writing Task 3
- Should people learn the foreign language by going to the country that speaks the language? 60
- TPO. 24-integrated writing task
- The author states the methods of protecting the forest trees oaks from the spread of dangerous P. ramorum fungus. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter - argues that viewpoint trying to prove these three methods do not seem convincing.First and foremost 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author contends that these theorie...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'referred'.
Suggestion: referred
...author contends that these theories are refer to the sailors detections. The firs...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst area of dispute is the theory which suggest that the noise is caused by orc...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ispute is the theory which suggest that the noise is caused by orca whales durin...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cas live near the surface of the ocean. The noise is heard from the deep ocean.Howe...
^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... The noise is heard from the deep ocean.However, this directly refutes the reading pass...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nued for 2 decades. A question is raised about the disappearance of these noises ...
^^
Line 6, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...ese noises in the following years. Again,this contradicts what is stated in the readi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31899641577 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60543647502 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9446432743 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402341074441 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13668576459 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171673057513 0.0662205650399 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213647843916 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.282749278493 0.0443174109184 638% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.