The reading passage mentions the critic’s doubts on the validity and reliance of facts described in the memoir written by Chavelier and states corresponding instances and reasons. The professor, however, refutes each of those doubts by providing counter arguments and explanations to corresponding reasons and is indeed confident of the memoir’s reliance.
To begin with, the professor mentions that even though Chavelier has taken a loan from a merchant while in Switzerland, this mere loan does not imply him being poor. As an evidence, he underscores the point that Chavelier has spent lot of money on parties and he had to sell his assets to procure this large amount money which naturally requires time. So this loan is just to make up for that time delay. Hence, this explanation overrules the claim by the reading passage saying Chavelier was poor.
Further, the reading passage argues about the memoir's record of Chavelier's conversation with Voltaire as improbable since it is difficult to remember the details of the conversation as the memoir was written much later. The professor offers to reconcile this argument by mentioning that Chavelier has habit of maintaining a notes. The professor goes to mention that Chavelier has indeed written down the conversation in this notes just that night it has happening and later consulted it while writing the memoir. Additionally, many of Chavelier's friends confirm the notes keeping habit of Chavelier.
Finally, the professor brings in the fact that many other prisoners in the Venice prison have more influential contacts than Chavelier had and yet none of them have managed to escape the prison by bribing the officials. Henceforth, it can be agreed that Chavelier haven't taken this path to escape. Furthermore, one of the Venetian Governments documents indeed mention that, after Chavelier’s escape, they had to repair the ceiling of the cell that held him, why else would they need to repair it unless he has escaped the same way as described in the memoir, i.e, by making a hole in the ceiling?
- TOEFL integrated writing: work a four-day week. 73
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 75
- woman in a white dress belongs to James McNeill Whistler. may be written by another painter 73
- Integrated essay from ETS official guide to toefl test ''Doubts on Rembrandt painting" 73
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a note' or simply 'notes'?
Suggestion: a note; notes
...that Chavelier has habit of maintaining a notes. The professor goes to mention that Cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...indeed written down the conversation in this notes just that night it has happening ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...eforth, it can be agreed that Chavelier havent taken this path to escape. Furthermore,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19345238095 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85526817217 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1875242368 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.230769231 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.