The text and the recording are about a painting of Rembrandt and if this painting belongs to him.
First, the text affirms that there are some strange things in the woman's clothes. She is using a white linen cap and a luxurious fur collar, which doesn't make sense because white linen caps were used by servants, but a servant never would have money to buy an expensive collar like this. However, the recording notes that the collar wasn't part of the painting, it was added a long time after Rembrandt end it. Someone was trying to increase the value of this art.
Secondly, the author states that the painting's light and shadow don't fit together. The woman's face wouldn't be illuminated by the light reflected by the collar because it is black, and an artist that was a master of light and shadow would never make a mistake like this. Therefore, the lecturer claims that this collar was a simple light one, so the face would be illuminated by the light reflected, rebutting the argument of the text.
Thirdly, the reading points out that the panel of the painting is made of wood pieces glued together. Rembrandt never used this kind of panel, hence this painting doesn't belong to him. However, the listening rebuts this idea affirming that the panel was one entire piece, and made of the same wood of the other Rembrandt painting's panels. Some people in the past tried to make the painting more expensive did that.
In conclusion, it is easy to see that the lecturer and the author have conflicting ideas. One writing that the painting doesn't belong to Rembrandt and the other saying that it belongs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n cap and a luxurious fur collar, which doesnt make sense because white linen caps wer...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...er, the recording notes that the collar wasnt part of the painting, it was added a lo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tes that the paintings light and shadow dont fit together. The womans face wouldnt b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...adow dont fit together. The womans face wouldnt be illuminated by the light reflected b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...this kind of panel, hence this painting doesnt belong to him. However, the listening r...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng ideas. One writing that the painting doesnt belong to Rembrandt and the other sayin...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the other saying that it belongs.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73404255319 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29012407442 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492907801418 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.227438616 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3571428571 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0496168865998 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219600679927 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298374663269 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0385408385433 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235769969559 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.42419426049 82% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.