The reading and the lecture are both about the painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman White Bonnet" which has been attributed as a work of Rembrandt under doubt. The author of the reading believes that the problems associated with the painting suggests that it is not his work. The lecturer undermines the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that a thorough examination of this painting proves that it has the attributes of Rembrandt displayed in his paintings.
To begin with, author argues that this painting is inconsistent in the way it has created the woman. The article mentions that the woman has wore a white linen cap usually used by servants and a luxurious coat which is not affordable for a servant creating a doubt. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that the painting has been reconstructed to make it luxurious on top of the original work. That has created the doubt of inconsistency presented in the article.
Secondly, the writer suggests that in the painting the light and shadow do not fit together as displayed in his previous work. It is also said that Rembrandt would not have made such an error as one of the exceptional painters of his time. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. She elaborates on the point that in the original painting, there was a light colored coat that illuminated part of the face of the women showing the realistic feature of the light shadows.
Finally, the author posits that Rembrandt has used only a single sheet of wood in most of his creations. Moreover, it is stated that in this specific painting there are several pieces of wood glued together in the panel. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that these wood pieces were glued later to enlarge the painting to make it grand after several years. Additionally, he also notes that the wood used in this panel is from the same tree as one of Rembrandt’s other paintings. With these counter arguments, professor tries to convince that this art was originally created by Rembrandt.
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 62
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important thanexcellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TOEFL integrated writing The sea otter 85
- professors appearing on tv programs 80
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important thanexcellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nting suggests that it is not his work. The lecturer undermines the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'worn'.
Suggestion: worn
...The article mentions that the woman has wore a white linen cap usually used by serva...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88603988604 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79483258814 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7268451078 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2777777778 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0710899456574 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230490588738 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358484020482 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0439572729368 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256477252147 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.