TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV

Essay topics:

TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV

The reading passage states that the professors who appear as guests on television have great benefits. However, in the lecture, the lecturer refutes this claim and opposes each of the reasons presented in the reading passage.

First, reading claims that these appearances on television increase reputation of the professor. On the contrary, the lecturer states it might not be good for the professor on the professional basis. She states that these appearances indicate a lack of seriousness, lower inclination toward scholarly work and predilection towards entertainment. This can cause professor lower funding for the research work.

Second, reading posits that television appearances help to get positive publicity, higher donation and increased applications of students to the university. Lecturer refutes this claim by indicating time consumption of professor in these activities. According to the lecturer, the more time professor gives to these appearances, the lower time he can give to research work, respective students, and the university academics. Ultimately, it is not beneficial for university and students.

Third, reading states that public gains knowledge and insight from the real expert. In the opinion of lecturer, the content which is shown on the television doesn't have depth and seriousness. It is just brief data and background related to the area which professor indicates. In addition to this, she believes that any television reporter with little homework can explain this information.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-07 mary.ssherr 76 view
2017-08-24 sagarshukla 3 view
2018-07-06 Sanfre011 3 view
2018-08-08 hemanth@1729 3 view
2017-06-04 sanjai22 91 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gains'' or 'gain's'?
Suggestion: gains'; gain's
...s. Third, reading states that public gains knowledge and insight from the real exp...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ontent which is shown on the television doesnt have depth and seriousness. It is just ...
^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in addition', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.315175097276 0.261695866417 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.124513618677 0.158904122519 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0700389105058 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0194552529183 0.0435111971325 45% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0233463035019 0.0277247811725 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112840466926 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0350194552529 0.0370669169778 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00679887739 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0272373540856 0.0208969081088 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.132295719844 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0155642023346 0.0158828679856 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155642023346 0.0114777025283 136% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1519.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 228.0 271.125827815 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.66228070175 6.08160592843 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.44298245614 0.374372842146 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.372807017544 0.287516216867 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.289473684211 0.187439937562 154% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.214912280702 0.113142543107 190% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.00679887739 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 55.1393489127 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.2857142857 21.7502111507 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0434176118 49.3711431718 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 21.7502111507 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.878197800319 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 53.5664160401 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 2.76744186047 1.90840788429 145% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0306157685633 0.549887131256 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109409375261 0.142949733639 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.070629364077 0.0787303798458 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546667178803 0.631733273073 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151182514267 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158566626882 0.266732575781 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268063482926 0.103435571967 26% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.380898405263 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.013301243642 0.0530846634433 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0256871135672 0.40443939384 6% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018599267903 0.0528353158467 35% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.