The passage discusses the benefits of assembling a team for new projects in companies. The professor, however, makes doubts on these benefits, and provides some of his thoughts.
Firstly, the author makes an assertion on wider acknowledge and numerous skills of team members would lead company, or group, to finish the project quickly and efficiently. However, the professor contradicts with this assertion, and states that not every members in the team are taking equal responsibilities. In fact, there are some free-riders, whose contributions are considered as much as real contributers. Additionally, the professor indicates that the agreement on decisions as a team takes too much time to finish quickly, instead it would be late.
Secondly, the passage expresses that individual team members are able to contribute their idea, in which impose others, and they have a chance to "shine". The professor disagrees the contribution, and he thinks that some individuals influence others and don't allow other ideas to "shine". Moreover, although those influencer are warned by other to change the directions of the project in order not to fail, due to those influencers, who do regret to change their way, the failing of the projeject' responsibility is shared equally to each member.
- TPO 20 – task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 76
- TPO 06 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 72
- 41 Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias 83
- tpo 14 salvage logging 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t some individuals influence others and dont allow other ideas to 'shine'....
^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this influencer' or 'those influencers'?
Suggestion: this influencer; those influencers
...o 'shine'. Moreover, although those influencer are warned by other to change the direc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility is shared equally to each member.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5297029703 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29850485835 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633663366337 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3515982205 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.