Both the reading and the lecture talk about the science of archaeology in the United Kingdom. Although the reading explains three challenges for studying and conducting research in archaeology sites in twentieth century, the lecturer finds them unconvincing and talks about new guidelines and policies, established from 1990 by which these related limitations can be solved.
First, the reading states that most of archaeologically valuable sites were destroyed through construction projects. On the other hand, according to new rules, the government has forced the construction agencies to examine the site before any efforts for building. In the case of finding any valuable site, both agencies and officials of the city have to decide about the found site and make plane to manage it by either building around the site or continuing the excavation.
Second, the reading claims that not only enough financial supports from government were not available for further study, but also the government priorities had been changed. In contrast, the lecturer explains that according to new policies, the construction agencies were in charge of all expenses. Not only did they have to pay for initial excavation and analyses, but also they had to fund money for preservations of new site and artifacts.
Third, the author argues the limitation of finding proper job for archaeologists. However, the lecturer asserts that again through the new guidelines, the construction agencies also were in charge of recruiting archaeologists and paying them. The experts had to examine, preserve, do research and present data through articles. Thus, they became much more professional and appealing than before.
Essay topics
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Arif Ahmed
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, as for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48091603053 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94144831247 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.47625349 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288714026867 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105111318053 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610180223442 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169067252706 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319364245046 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.