TORREYA TAXIFOLYA
The reading provides three solutions to protect the Torreya Taxifolia evergreen tree from danger of extinction. However, the lecture strongly challenges the solutions for the following reasons
First, the reading suggests replanting the Torreya in its original areas in the northern of Florida where its specific microclimate exists , meanwhile the lecture claims that its specific microclimate had changed due to global warming that lead to warmer climate and the area became dry because water supply drained. Consequently the first solution is not valid.
Second, the reading offers another solution to replant Torreya further north from its original microclimate, where the climate is cooler and will ensure higher survival chance for Torreya. The reading however disagrees with this solution giving an example of black locust tree. When they replanted this tree it grew quickly and spread widely that it endangered the already plants and trees that were there, these plants and trees were already endangered with extinction. The lecture believes they eventually created more problems this way.
Last but not least, the reading mentions relocating Torreya from wild to research centers could be a solution. for instance, they will preserve Torreya and scientists would be able to closely monitor it and study it. The lecture however believes that the trees need to be in a big population and genetically diverse to resist a disease. consequently, the research centers are not big enough to accommodate big population. The third solution therefore is not well founded.
- some people prefer to work more hours and get paid more others prefer to work less and get paid less which one do you prefer and why 70
- In the united states employees typically work five days a week for eight hours however many employees want to work a four day week 73
- rembrandt 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a where its specific microclimate exists , meanwhile the lecture claims that its s...
^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... climate and the area became dry because water supply drained. Consequently the f...
^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...came dry because water supply drained. Consequently the first solution is not valid. Secon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...o research centers could be a solution. for instance, they will preserve Torreya an...
^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...enetically diverse to resist a disease. consequently, the research centers are not big enoug...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48148148148 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64394772147 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588477366255 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.4597510031 49.2860985944 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126757273802 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480669847043 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617671846685 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816600555318 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160392655706 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.