People in society work in many different settings, and for a variety of reasons. What do you think is the main reason why people have jobs?
to feel happier about their lives
to save money for the future
to develop new skills
Use specific examples and details to support your answer.
Only a narrow-minded person would suggest that making money is the single reason people go to work every day. Personally, I believe people get jobs for two reasons that I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, having a job gives our lives a sense of purpose. Which is beneficial for our mental health. The objectives of our job are something to strive for each day and make it easy to establish long and short-term goals. Without a job, people often feel directionless. Take my compelling experience as an example. In 2008, after ten years of working in a fast-paced corporate environment, I was laid off from my job. Although I was financially secure and did not need a new position right away, I was tremendously depressed because I did not have an official job. Pursuing my hobbies was fun, but I lacked something to strive for each day. On the other hand, while I had a job, I had been assigned sales objectives and profit objectives to work towards. And without these goals, I felt depressed. Obviously, accomplishing professional goals always gave me a sense of satisfaction.
Second, going to work every day is a great opportunity to meet new people, which can provide us with a sense of happiness. Meanwhile, unemployed people interact mostly with family members and old friends. Which might be boring sometimes. For instance, I worked at a local supermarket when I was in high school. I look back on this experience with fondness. Because I was jubilant to chat with an eclectic assortment of customers who came in. In fact, it was one of my best jobs despite I was not paid much like my current job.
In conclusion, People get jobs not only because they aim for a purpose in their life, but also because they get the chance to connect with interesting people
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 76 | view |
2023-04-11 | fmichela | 73 | view |
2022-05-12 | Alia Mahbob | 60 | view |
2021-11-23 | Tina-Poorbaghi | 83 | view |
2021-08-01 | ChiuYuan | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes it is better to be dishonest with people than to always tell them the truth Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 73
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a method of 91
- Which of the following values do you think is most important to teach to a young child Being honest or being helpful or being patient 70
- It s important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends do you agree or disagree 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly with family members and old friends. Which might be boring sometimes. For instance...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... back on this experience with fondness. Because I was jubilant to chat with an eclectic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70926517572 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82033176223 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6686943415 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.1904761905 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209099755902 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588616328101 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545683489548 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143323289348 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538694463623 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.