The reading and the lecturer are both saying about the number of working days per week. The author of the reading believes that the mandatory four work days per week should be follow. The lecturer cast doubt on the claims made in the article that five working days per week is enough to fulfil the job.
First of all, the author points out that it will benefits to the company. It’s mentioned that it can save money by adding more employees. This point is challenged by the lecturer, by hiring more employees it will cost a lot of money. He says, the company will spend for their health benefits and that’s not helping for company to invest a lot of money to hire a new employee.
Secondly, the author contends that it will prevents error and save time if the company hired new employees. The lecturer rebut this argument, he suggest not to hire more employees because it’s too risky if they hired new employees without enough experience on the field of work.
Finally, the author states that working on a short week, will increase the profits of the company. The lecturer on the other hand, posits that working on a short week will not increase the profits of the company, however, working on a long week, it does.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 60
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'followed'?
Suggestion: followed
...atory four work days per week should be follow. The lecturer cast doubt on the claims ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ur work days per week should be follow. The lecturer cast doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...all, the author points out that it will benefits to the company. It's mentioned tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'prevent'
Suggestion: prevent
...ondly, the author contends that it will prevents error and save time if the company hire...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'rebuts'.
Suggestion: rebuts
...mpany hired new employees. The lecturer rebut this argument, he suggest not to hire m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...s. The lecturer rebut this argument, he suggest not to hire more employees because it&a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67123287671 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28577925573 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8502739086 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291397037758 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110029704721 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529442174461 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164264984986 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294632066059 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.