Along with opposing the reading article, the lecture shows the drawbacks of the four days work habit in a week. The disagreements illustrated below with the proper example.
Firstly, In the passage, it's been stated that if a person works 4 days a week instead of 5 days, it will cost less money to the companies gaining more work from the employees. As a reason, it's been said that working only 4 days in a week the employee will get enough time to take rest, to spend quality time with family and in return, they will provide flawless work to the employers. It's true in a sense that employees getting enough time to focus their attention anywhere else rather working in a company though are get paid less amount working for only 4 days in a week. In a hackneyed sense, it may seem that giving this opportunity company has to lose less amount of money rather paying its employees for 5 days. The lecture has clearly broken the myth that providing this opportunity a company cannot be well benefitted due to some reasons. A company needs backup people to accomplish the rest of the works left by the employees who are working for 4 days in a week. In return, a company has to spend more money hiring more employees and giving them other facilities. If we say about the medical facilities it remains same for the employees who are working for 4 days in a week instead of 5 days. It clearly implies that a company cannot be well benefited if it allows its workers to work 4 days in a week instead of 5 days.
Secondly, Now if we think this issue in another way like if a company give its employees 4 days working facilities then for sure that company will try to accomplish all of its works within 4 days instead of 5 days. The consequence of this will bring a lot more working pressure to its employees and eventually employees will get demotivated soon. As the same time workers will not work naturally or loving the work. This will lead to them a robotic life which will diminish the higher life expectency. As they will get paid only 80 percent remuneration in return for highly burdensome work their quest to switch the job will increase to a great extent. On the other hand, if management is bound to allow its employees 4 days working instead of 5 days in the time of peak working days, they will surely fire those who seek 4 days work period. It is really harmful to the career of the employees.
So, what was stated in the passage, the audio lecture defied each and every single logic showing that 4 working days cannot fulfill the requirements which is done in 5 days. In a simple view, it may seem that allowing employees for 4 working days in a week rather 5 days has much more advantage in the perspective of a company or even an employee but finally, the scrutinized analysis persuades that allowing employees only for 4 days cannot have the same impact is it was done working for 5 days.
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is it was done working for 5 days.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 1373.03311258 173% => OK
No of words: 533.0 270.72406181 197% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46904315197 5.08290768461 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.04702891845 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46743020018 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 145.348785872 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403377110694 0.540411800872 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 419.366225166 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5956776081 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.65 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42320496364 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159158773153 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089195280137 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268647848816 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102506578529 0.0443174109184 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 53.8541721854 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.2367328918 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.