In the set of material, both reading passage and lecture discuss approach projects is to assemble a group of the team. Both affirm that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills, making decisions better to work.
The author says that creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make decisions than an individual might not undertake. Even though, the lecture affirms that one or two people can have solutions and influencer a team about a decision. Therefore, we can affirm that an individual person can have a decision better than a group. In the other hand, if the decision has a wrong consequence, all the group are punished because of the decision of one person.
The author’s claims that the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her ideas and contributions highly significant. However, the lecture affirms that a team can have ideas and greater impact, solve problems faster that only one person and with productivity.
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 60
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 68
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 80
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing TaskSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. 76
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, both reading pas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01744186047 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90601728352 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.490470346 49.2860985944 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.875 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51278373379 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21928315105 0.0996497079465 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754450493225 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312620038196 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104712455318 0.0443174109184 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.