In the set of material, both reading passage and lecture discuss approach projects is to assemble a group of the team. Both affirm that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills, making decisions better to work.
The author says that creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make decisions than an individual might not undertake. Even though, the lecture affirms that one or two people can have solutions and influencer a team about a decision. Therefore, we can affirm that an individual person can have a decision better than a group. In the other hand, if the decision has a wrong consequence, all the group are punished because of the decision of one person.
The author’s claims that the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her ideas and contributions highly significant. However, the lecture affirms that a team can have ideas and greater impact, solve problems faster that only one person and with productivity.
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 76
- test new model 3
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 60
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing TaskSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, both reading pas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01744186047 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90601728352 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.490470346 49.2860985944 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.875 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51278373379 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21928315105 0.0996497079465 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754450493225 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312620038196 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104712455318 0.0443174109184 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.