Lecture disagrees with points made in reading about the fact that dinasours are endotherm. She rejected all reasons which have been brought by reading one by one in order to prove that dinasours are not endotherm.
First, lecture claims that when dinasours live in polar areas these places are not cold as current time as. So we can not conclude that dinasours maintained their temperature because of finding fossils in these locations. Furthermore they could migrate when the weather is cold or could hibernate such as the other reptiles.
Secondly, lecture illustrates the other function of legs and contests with the connection between endothermy and position of legs. Legs of dinasours are underneath of their body in order to handle their heaviness and high weight instead of running subject.
In other point, although dinasours had Harversian canals but it does not mean that they are endothermy. Because there are evidences about growth ring in their body which show they had priods of growing not rapidly. Hence the reasons about this canals and its relationship with endothermy has been denied with lecturer by presenting some disproof facts.
In conclusion, lecture does not accept reading's philosophy about dinasours could regulate their body's heat and she presents some negative rejection instances.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 90
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes 70
- Some companies sponsor sport as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantagesDiscuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 76
- tpo19 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... of finding fossils in these locations. Furthermore they could migrate when the weather is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...does not mean that they are endothermy. Because there are evidences about growth ring i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...they had priods of growing not rapidly. Hence the reasons about this canals and its r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ng not rapidly. Hence the reasons about this canals and its relationship with endoth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57268595397 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.2031692818 49.2860985944 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169683335504 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070142512749 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258934720297 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946206229674 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369824043877 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.