The article states that there are 3 competing theories that determine the buildings in Chaco Canyon in New mexico were used and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that unfortuantely none of these arugments explanation is convincing and he refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading avers that teh Chaco strutures were resdential, with each housing hundred of people. The professor, howver, refutes this point by saying that from the outside view of these structure could be for residential purpose, but from the inside looking it cast doubt the residential theory. he adds that if these structures were hosuing hundreds of people, we should have been discovered so many fireplaces that people used for cooking. This point were missing in the Chaco location, for example archaelogists found in one location a fireplaces remains that could be used for 10 families, but the rooms of this house could take hundred of people. As a result these structures could not have been residential.
Second, the article claims that the Chaco structures used for storage food supplies, such as grain maize. On the other hand, the professsor opposes this point by stating this idea is unsupported by evidence to jusify it. Even though the buildings plausible to store food, The archaelogists did not discover enough remains of maize traces and the maize containers. Ansd so, the professor concludes that without finding enough evidenceof remaining maize, the theory of these buidling were used to store maize is totally unconvincing.
Third, the reading posits that houses were used as cermonial centers, such as Pubelo Alto house. The professor disagrees with point by explaining that this theory is not well supported. Excavations of the mound revealed other materials that unexpextedly have been found that should not have been there if these houses were for special festival. For instance, archaelogists have been discovered bluiding materials like sand, soil and they also found construction tools. The professor adds that these remains could explain that these the location of Pubelo Alto was trash place. Moreover, the broken pots that discovered in this location could have been regular trash too that couuld have been left from construction workers. The professor concludes that the findingof Pubelo ALto location is not good evidence to assume that these structures were used for cermonies.
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 70
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 85
- Hydropower dams are massive concrete walls placed inside rivers or streams to hold back water. Holes in the dam allow controlled amounts of water to pass through and as it moves through these holes, it passes through a machine, which converts that movemen 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ures were resdential, with each housing hundred of people. The professor, howver, refut...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... it cast doubt the residential theory. he adds that if these structures were hosu...
^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... but the rooms of this house could take hundred of people. As a result these structures...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...his house could take hundred of people. As a result these structures could not hav...
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...article claims that the Chaco structures used for storage food supplies, such as...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Chaco structures used for storage food supplies, such as grain maize. On the ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1373.03311258 150% => OK
No of words: 385.0 270.72406181 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35064935065 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67829364951 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496103896104 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 419.366225166 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9215467889 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385901515577 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133109806515 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753402851782 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229416816557 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069609699018 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.