TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy

The article states that Fuel cell engines will replace internal-combustion engines by providing three advantages of Fuel cell engines over internal-combustion engines. The professor, however claims that replacing by Fuel cell engines is not an effective solution and confutes each of the author reasons.

First, the reading claims that hydrogen, used as fuel for fuel cell engines, are abundant and can be used for long time period. The professor refutes the point by saying that even though hydrogen is easily from various sources but isn't directly useful. He states that hydrogen should be in pure liquid states and it is technically very difficult produce and preserve in such states.

Second, the author posits that use of fuel cell engines will extirpate world's global warming problem. However, author says that global warming problem will be unsolved. According to professor, the production of liquid hydrogen fuel needs a lot of energy, which is produced by burning of woods and coal; thus producing a same amount of carbon dioxide produced by internal-combustion engine.

Third, the reading says that it is economical to use fuel cell engines due to it's high efficiency. The professor encounter this points by explaining that hydrogen fuels are dramatically higher than automobile fuel. We have also learned that Platinum used to prepare fuel cell is very costly and replacement of it with other cheaper metal have been unsuccessful.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ogen is easily from various sources but isnt directly useful. He states that hydroge...
^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'encounters'.
Suggestion: encounters
...e to its high efficiency. The professor encounter this points by explaining that hydrogen...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33624454148 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93640767545 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.116610986 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.090909091 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556573510809 0.272083759551 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215973413934 0.0996497079465 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132343012332 0.0662205650399 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351449478294 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102828195157 0.0443174109184 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.