tpo 1
The reading and the lecture are both about the four-day workweek, which is willing to accept less pay. The author of the reading believes four-day week will benefit companies. But in the lecture, the professor holds a totally different view that no one will be advantageous four-day workweek.
First, the passage says that reducing workweek leads to increased corporate profits. On the other hand, increasing employees' rest time reduces their errors, however the lecture point out that four-day workweek will lead to a lot of spending money especially on training and medical health.
Second, the passage climes that the four-day workweek reduces unemployment rates. The lecture refutes the idea company. Hiring a new job is costly for companies, and they use five-day workweek employees. Hence, companies do not add new jobs
Third, the passage suggests that improve the quality of individual employees, and provided leisure time their families. The lecture argues against the passage. Free time leads to lower quality of personal life and increased risk of individual lives because this can lead to the risk of losing the job to economic downtown.
- tpo 1 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement While parents have the responsibility to educate young people about healthy eating habits schools should also be responsible for this 88
- do you agree or disagree with this statement:Nowadays act of having meals together with family members is not important anymore. 63
- TPO 41 76
- If your teacher says something incorrect in a class what will you do 1 Interrupt your teacher right away 2 keep silent 3 correct your teacher after class 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 183.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34972677596 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54562711032 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0297432195 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.