TPO 11
The lecture and the passage discuss the effects of less reading literature. Although the passage claims that this decline can have some unfortunate effects on culture, reading public and literature itself, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that literature will weaken people's intellectual stimulation. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that people read science, historical, political analysis books that have a high quality. These books just creative and still imagination book that helps people to improve intellectual stimulation.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that people tend to see the TV and a movie instead of reading literature, and they are reducing their time for reading books. However, the professor argues that spending less time with literature not means reed less book. In the new era, some valuable book change to music and movies and people prefer to use this equipment. This change because of a change in culture.
Finally, although the reading passage says that due to the decrease in reading literature, there is fewer financial support from publishers for good writers, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the reader is not blaming in this situation. The author faults this situation. Because books are to difficult to understand for young people, so people are not willing to read them. She also says that ancient people may not read this kind of literature too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | meet96300 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | Alana Gerber | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | khatuntajkera | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Pooja dave | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 297, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...aults this situation. Because books are to difficult to understand for young peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40495867769 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60337465474 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566115702479 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.309262146 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431167668301 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153507417024 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066692504242 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269139102668 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529742262171 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.