Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning. Give reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, education has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, researchers have always searched for ways to enhance the student enthusiastic. A controversial question which is often raised this idea is that if a teacher becomes favourable among their students, he/ she could not become efficient in helping their students. I contend that a kindly teacher can more effective than an unfavourable teacher. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that a favourite teacher can make some provoke to their students. To elaborate on my point, when a teacher has kindly behaviour, she can improve enthusiastic on their students. In this situation, students persuasion to go to the class so that they tend to listen to carefully. Hence, they try to make their teachers happy; therefore, they study their lesson a lot. Also, the students obey their teacher role so that they preservation the discipline of the class. In other words, the teacher can educate their lesson in effective ways and improve the efficiency of their students. But, if the students do not like their teachers, they would not listen to their teachers. Furthermore, they try to distribute the discipline of their class, and the teacher would hardly control the class. In this situation, the efficiency of the class is declined.
Another reason is that a kindly teacher provokes their students to study their lesson in the best ways. To shed more light on this matter, since a favourite teacher wants to teach a lesson, all the students want to listen carefully to learn in effective ways. So, they learn better their lesson, and they do their assignment on time without any force. I believe that when students like their teachers, they learn their lesson in the best ways and they can get a high-grade so that they can entire in the best university in their country. Also, these students become flourishing people in the future. But, is students do not like their teacher, they would not attempt to their lesson. Maybe they hate their school or lesson; therefore, they do not study well their lesson.
All in all, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that a popular teacher can better control a class and has an effect on their students than an unpopular teacher. I believe that a kindly teacher not only makes provoke on their students but also become their students to flourishing person.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 60
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 70
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 73
- TPO 47 70
- TPO 24 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 276, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...learn in effective ways. So, they learn better their lesson, and they do their assignm...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01913875598 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70381924187 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433014354067 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2351538673 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2173913043 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82608695652 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155209452193 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654237635313 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043460141965 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1251736818 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281838618089 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.