TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for

The article discusses that the effects of young people reading far less literature-novels, plays, and poems on the reading public. The author provides three reasons of support. However, the professor disagrees with the author's studies result and she refurtes each of the reasons that stated in the article.

First, the reading avers that since people reading less, they are missing out so important information. The professor, on the other hand, opposes this point by explaining that there are other books, other than literature have provided the public with valuable benefits. For instance, scientistic, historical, and even political books. Also, these othertypes of books have good qualities and so creative, which will stimulate personal imagination.

Second, the article claims that self-help books are usally superficial poorly written, in addtion, watching TV, or music videos, and so is complete waste of time. Conversely, the professor refutes this point by saying that watching movies , or listen to a good music is not waste of time. According to professor, these cultural changes have improved forms of expressions.

Third, the reading posits that even though literature's publishers are talentaed, there are no enough supporting for them. The professor, on the other hand, explains that this point is correct, but this is not because of people read less literature. She states that author's have to balmed for this less supporting, since they have difficulty to understand new situations and modifications. Whic is different than in the past.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...his point by saying that watching movies , or listen to a good music is not waste ...
^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ns and modifications. Whic is different than in the past.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48132780083 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8141466713 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585062240664 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4822381504 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2142857143 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369296980125 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116635701 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111742847405 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22029196892 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728606917248 0.0443174109184 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.