Both the paragraph and lecture is discussing about the decline in reading of less literature and its effect. Paragraph points the people as the reason for the decline in the literature reading. Where as lecture casts doubt on the explanation mentioned in the paragraph.
Firstly, paragraph states that reading of less literature leads to declination of the intellectual level like missing imagination quality, understanding of language and so many benefits. Contrary to this explanation, lecture says that reading less literature is not signifying the intellectual level. Books on science, history and politics turning into novels which do not have that quality to get benefits.
Secondly, paragraph shows that people are involving in television, music,reading web pages and reading poorly written novels instead of reading quality literature which leads to the reduction in the culture quality. Where as lecture states that there are plenty of culture material is available but in different forms like in better songs and good movies. Only forms of expression has been changed to get benefits. Better songs and good movies are better in understanding culture values in compare to novels and old poems.
Thirdly, paragraph states that number of good writers are decreasing because of less audience and getting less supports from the lead publishers. While lecture says that authors are getting less support not because of audience and publishers but due to their own faults. Writers are providing materials which is hard to understand in compare to earlier times.
- TOEFL T P O 5 Integrated Writing Task 83
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 76
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
... the decline in the literature reading. Where as lecture casts doubt on the explanation ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the decline in the literature reading. Where as lecture casts doubt on the explanati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... Secondly, paragraph shows that people are involving in television, music,reading web pages ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , reading
...eople are involving in television, music,reading web pages and reading poorly written no...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...o the reduction in the culture quality. Where as lecture states that there are plenty of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun supports is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ng because of less audience and getting less supports from the lead publishers. Whil...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.31954887218 0.261695866417 122% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0827067669173 0.0723426182421 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0413533834586 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00751879699248 0.0277247811725 27% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.15037593985 0.128828473217 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0601503759398 0.0370669169778 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77904816571 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338345864662 0.0208969081088 162% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0601503759398 0.128158765124 47% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0187969924812 0.0114777025283 164% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1564.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 244.0 271.125827815 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.40983606557 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.450819672131 0.374372842146 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.364754098361 0.287516216867 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213114754098 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159836065574 0.113142543107 141% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77904816571 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512295081967 0.539623497131 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.8760155387 53.8517498576 89% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7692307692 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1708275734 49.3711431718 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 55.2446406053 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.56363636364 1.90840788429 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.651717638359 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.180988558141 0.142949733639 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.12706619646 0.0787303798458 161% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.619624637455 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144281312447 0.139662658121 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275888802556 0.266732575781 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127775553473 0.103435571967 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.288775206044 0.414875509568 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0211305154879 0.0530846634433 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.441103687483 0.40443939384 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647104190894 0.0528353158467 122% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.