TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo
The reading and the lecture are both about Jane Austin, the famous English novelist which casts doubts whether the portrait was her or not. The author of the reading believes that it is in fact the true image of the novelist. However, the lecturer casts doubts about the claims made in the article and refutes all the theories presented in the reading passage.
First of all, the author points out that the image presented in the editorial letter was Jane Austin. The article notes that family member recognized the portrait of the author. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says it is not convincing that the portrait was Austin, whereas, there are no evidence that it was Austin due to she was dead 70 years ago and family members haven't seen her long time ago.
Secondly the author contends that in Casandra's Sketch it resembles the facial features of Austin such as eyebrows, nose, mouth and overall aspects in the portrait. The articles notes that although the sketch was amateurish, it depicts the characteristics of the writer. However, the lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that there were no evidence that it Jane on her teenage years. He elaborates on this by mentioning that it was Mary Ann, that was in the image which looks exactly like the novelist. Furthermore, He argues that there is no concrete proof to support that it was her in the canvas, but, it was her distant cousin which has a resemblance to Austin.
Lastly, the author states that although the painting was outdated and unsigned, there are evidence to show that it was painted when she was a teenager. The article establishes that the image was painted by Ozias Humphrey, the strokes and styles in the painting dictates that it was the style of the painter. The author, on the other hand, posits that it was the style of the society portrait painter, but later date on the canvas shows that it was not made by Humphrey. The articles establishes that the blank canvas that was used in the portrait of Austin were a merchandise from William Leg, hence, Leg did not sell his canvas on London whereas the portrait was drawn. In addition the canvas was way older than the girl in the portrait.
- TPO 34- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Website.Use specific reasons and exa 71
- TPO 13- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown 73
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 73
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reason 76
- TPO 40 Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...as dead 70 years ago and family members havent seen her long time ago. Secondly the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'note'.
Suggestion: note
...l aspects in the portrait. The articles notes that although the sketch was amateurish...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exactly like the novelist. Furthermore, He argues that there is no concrete proo...
^^
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...shows that it was not made by Humphrey. The articles establishes that the blank can...
^^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'establish'.
Suggestion: establish
... was not made by Humphrey. The articles establishes that the blank canvas that was used in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 675, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ndon whereas the portrait was drawn. In addition the canvas was way older than the girl ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 10.4613686534 277% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 12.0772626932 207% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72845953003 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40042796485 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45953002611 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5252044891 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.611111111 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273621594409 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999322488913 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526332556551 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173114011558 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462466197352 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.