tpo 14
The material discusses the concept of dealing with forest fires by salvage logging. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely cleaning up the forest after fires could create the right condition for trees' growth. Next, removing the dead trees could reduce insect populations that may damage live trees. Finally, salvage logging has economic benefits and could create new job opportunities.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is rapid removing of dead trees could lake nutrients that could be necessary for the growth of the live tree. In addition to that, dead trees could increase the growth of some bark betttle; however, it could increase the growth of other birds and insects that contribute to healthy forests. One final point, salvage logging does not have any economic benefits; given that it is done by using helicopters which is very expensive. Furthermore, creating jobs for local society will be temporary, and fill by outside workers because local residents are not trained enough.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the information presented.
- tpo 42 63
- tpo 08 the Chevalier memior 81
- tpo 33 60
- some people believe that the internet provides them with a lot of valuable information, others claim that too much information could create problems 88
- educating children is harder today than it was in the past, because of cellphones, online games and social media accounts 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d could create new job opportunities. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al residents are not trained enough. In summary, there are discrepancies in t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52820512821 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65125725327 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635897435897 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4183126813 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323045621224 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122015487156 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671450890923 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160058756331 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10423980036 0.0443174109184 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.