The reading and the speaker discussing about how to control the population of Cane toad but in vary contrast ways.
Firstly, this animal is native species of america and Australia got this animal for destroying the insects which causes damages to the crops but things are turnout in wrong way, they started over populated and competed for the native species of the Australia, So, they want make national fence to prevent the population toad. But the lecture refutes this point by stating that even if, they are making the fence still, it's eggs are able to spread the population with help of river and waters streams which further increases the population of toad with few eggs.
Secondly, reading passage states that by arranging the volunteers to trap the toad and kill them, it is easy because it restricted to water. Again, the speaker argues this point by saying that volunteers are not trained professional so they may be not able distinct between frogs and toads that may lead to destruction in the frogs species which every important foe ecology system of Australia.
Thirdly, reading passage explains that by introducing virus in the toad they can kill the entire toad population, it may causes dead in reptiles and amphibians, so it is not going to other species apart from these two species. Still, the professor opposes this point by explaining that when infected toad transport to north america from Australia through trading then that infected animals causes lethal effect on the native toad. Native toad plays very important role in the american ecology system which disturb the entire system.
To sum up, reading passage says that they control the toads by fence, volunteer and introducing the virus into it's body but the speaker refutes these all points with reasonable logic evidences
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Studies have shown that children are spending more time watching television and less time doing active or creative activities. Explain why this is the case. Suggest possible measures than can encourage children to participate in active or creative actions 67
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 71
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h help of river and waters streams which further increases the population of toad...
^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l them, it is easy because it restricted to water. Again, the speaker argues this...
^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ues this point by saying that volunteers are not trained professional so they may...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ads that may lead to destruction in the frogs species which every important foe ecolo...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l points with reasonable logic evidences
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'apart from', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272445820433 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.160990712074 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0681114551084 0.0723426182421 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0433436532508 0.0435111971325 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0402476780186 0.0277247811725 145% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130030959752 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0495356037152 0.0370669169778 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37766458713 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030959752322 0.0208969081088 148% => OK
Particles: 0.0030959752322 0.00154638098197 200% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.128158765124 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0123839009288 0.0158828679856 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0216718266254 0.0114777025283 189% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1827.0 1645.83664459 111% => OK
No of words: 300.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276666666667 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.143333333333 0.187439937562 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103333333333 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37766458713 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526666666667 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.5401470475 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 33.3333333333 21.7502111507 153% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7191002835 49.3711431718 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.0 132.220823453 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 21.7502111507 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 0.878197800319 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 61.0 50.5018328374 121% => OK
Elegance: 1.84810126582 1.90840788429 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.706274272684 0.549887131256 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152035022575 0.142949733639 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0709535032145 0.0787303798458 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.76903622689 0.631733273073 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155178632291 0.139662658121 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.383962518489 0.266732575781 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083095591553 0.103435571967 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371606704151 0.414875509568 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0697146224009 0.0530846634433 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.473808316228 0.40443939384 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719072714095 0.0528353158467 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.