TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can the from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology,dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts,was faced with the problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain's population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites.Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most only remained sites but which left hundreds of other the projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reductions in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers and contributing to archaeological research only as unpaid amateurs.
The reading passage discusses three problems that are facing archaeological excavation in Britain. However, the speaker in the lecture mentions that rules and guidelines adopted since 1990s were able to resolve these issues.
First and foremost, the writer claims that many valuable artifacts were lost during construction of new buildings. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the fact that the new laws required examination of the site by archaeologists to decide whether or not it was of archeological interest or value before the construction companies were able to proceed with building. Furthermore, if it it " style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 19.36px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">was determined to be of value, archaeologists, builders and local government officials were to get together and make a plan to preserve the site either by professional excavation and documentation or by building around it.
Secondly, the author holds that the reduction in government funding has led to less and less sites sites " style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 19.36px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">to be excavated. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture indicates that according to the enacted rules, the construction firms have to pay the initial examination fees plus any charges for all the work done under the preservation plan. This new source of funding was pivotal since researchers researchers " style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 19.36px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">were enabled to study far greater range of sites than they did in the past.
Lastly, the excerpt avers that job opportunities in archaeology archaeology " style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 19.36px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">were limited since these positions were only provided by the government agencies or universities. In contrast, the lecturer postulates that new paid work work " style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 19.36px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">was offered for archaeologists, thanks to the new legislations. they they " style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 19.36px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">were hired to examine sites, draw a conservation plan, do research in a professional and scientific manners and finally collect data and write reports. As a result, the new bills increased the demand for archaeologists.
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 90
- TPO-26 Integrated WritingThe zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stoppe 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 85
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...of the site by archaeologists to decide whether or not it was of archeological interest or val...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
... proceed with building. Furthermore, if it it ' style='color: rgb51, 51, 51...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: sites
...rnment funding has led to less and less sites sites ' style='color: rgb51, 51, 51...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 519, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: researchers
...new source of funding was pivotal since researchers researchers ' style='color: rgb51, 51, 51...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: archaeology
...excerpt avers that job opportunities in archaeology archaeology ' style='color: rgb51, 51, 51...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: work
..., the lecturer postulates that new paid work work ' style='color: rgb51, 51, 51...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 558, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ogists, thanks to the new legislations. they they ' style='color: rgb51, 5...
^^^^
Line 13, column 558, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: they
...ogists, thanks to the new legislations. they they ' style='color: rgb51, 51, 51...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1373.03311258 167% => OK
No of words: 365.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26575342466 5.08290768461 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.00348318975 2.5805825403 155% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.7084386005 49.2860985944 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.583333333 110.228320801 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4166666667 21.698381199 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133311580826 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809011580347 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532412954119 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110148706497 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493463241456 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.3589403974 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.8541721854 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.68 12.2367328918 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.