The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology — dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts—was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain's population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites. Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate.
For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most important sites but which left hundreds of other interesting projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reductions in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers and contributing to archaeological research only as unpaid amateurs.
The articale and the lecture are both about archaeologi in United Kindom. The author of the reading feels that old cultural artifacts was faced with a serious issues in United Kindom.The lecturer challengers the claims made by the author. He thinks that there were no such issue in Britain.
First of all, the author argues that because of new constructions in Britain led decrease the nunber of archaeological valubel places. The article is mantion that uncoverd archaeologically valuable places distroies by digging foudations for new buildings. This point is challenge by the lecturer. She claims that constraction sights shoud be check by archaeologist befoer they start constructions. Furthermore she says that if they found any archaeological value in constuction eara then they had to build the building around the archaeological sight.
Secondly, the author suggest that the financial support for the archaeologists is very low. The article snotes that most of the archaeology was funded mostly through govenment. The lecturer rebust this argument. She suggest that those days the construction company should support the reasreches to do their research.
Finally, Theauthor states that it was heard to find archaeology jobs those days. In contast the lecturers's position is that lot of experts hired on archaeology and he says that their was no such problem in those days.
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1 3
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...ural artifacts was faced with a serious issues in United Kindom.The lecturer challenge...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... with a serious issues in United Kindom.The lecturer challengers the claims made by...
^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... with a serious issues in United Kindom.The lecturer challengers the claims made by...
^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...logist befoer they start constructions. Furthermore she says that if they found any archaeo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... The lecturer rebust this argument. She suggest that those days the construction compan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44700460829 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02629222769 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626728110599 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1913151562 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4285714286 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.041513350469 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0146593688823 0.0996497079465 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0133643624522 0.0662205650399 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0232640957118 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171317145781 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.