TPO 17 integrated the population of birds is decreasing because of three reasons:
human populations are expanding
agricultural activities are increasing
the usage of chemical pesticides are increasing.
The article asserts that growing population of humans and increased usage of chemical agricultural additives have affected the wildlife negatively and caused a decrease in birds' population in the USA. Notwithstanding, the professor does not agree with the justifications written by the author and claims that they are completely unconvincing. Her explanations are addressed as the following.
First of all, the passage insists that there will be a continuous disappearance in birds' natural habitats owing to the expansion of mankinds' population. However, the educator overthrows this opinion inasmuch as she thinks that urban growth has cause negative effects on "some" birds and simultaneously has improved the possibility of living for other types of birds, such as pigeons, hawks, falcons, and landfills. She declares that the growth of humans' population is not going to decline the population of birds uniformly; in other words, some types shrink and some others grow.
Secondly, the reading claims that increasing agricultural activities for fulfilling people's requirements is another assumption of birds' population decline. Nonetheless, the teacher refutes this idea due to the fact that she believes the USA is gradually decreasing the utilization of lands for agricultural purposes each and every year. This objective is achievable thanks to the introduction of state-of-the-art productive crops that need smaller areas of lands.
Tertiary, the article upholds that the exploitation of chemical pesticides will shrink the population of birds as well as two aforemetioned justifications. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this notion, mainly because she thinks that new pesticides are less toxic than former traditional ones. Moreover, there is a growing trend of using pest-resistance crops which are not affected by chemicals; thus, they do not harm birds' population, and the requirement of pesticides will eventually decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-28 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
- the differences between online university programs and traditional courses by means ofone-on-on communicationsonline courses are not challenging or have high quality as usual coursestop schools do not offer online programs 90
- tpo 06life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- TPO 18 Integrated Toreyya trees are endangered and there are three ways to preserve them first reestablish them in the same location in which it lived for 1000 years second move them to another location far from its Florida microclimate third preserve it 80
- Chevalair lied about some parts of his memoir he was poor and asked for money he did not talk with Voltare he did not escape from a prison 88
- assigning projects to students alone or as a team 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 490, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...quirement of pesticides will eventually decreased.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, such as, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79861111111 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31923377993 2.5805825403 129% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7573202165 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397565719691 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126517957272 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882951551891 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214185473975 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447354266519 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.8541721854 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.2367328918 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.