Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds’ population due to change in human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture. The author avers that the number of bird population will continuously decrease in future, and he establishes his point by providing three most import reasons for it. The professor disagrees the authors' points and provides the alternates explanation of those rationales.
First of all, the author claims that bird's natural habitats will not remain at all due to expanding the use of land for human activities; as a result, the birds will not get the place to live in future. This point is challenged by the professor. He says the author assumes incorrectly this matter. Since only a few types of birds will be affected by this urbanization, birds’ diversification might happen. Moreover, there are many birds whose live at city areas, and they successfully habitats in there.
Secondly, since to satisfy human need farmland will be extended in areas where the wild bird lives, birds will be faced severe problems for its habitats, is claimed by the writer in the reading. However, the lecturer rebuts this assumption by informing that the recent technological advancement will change the situation. He also mentions that now people start to cultivate more yielding crops which need much fewer areas and produce huge food, so people will not need to destroy birds' natural habitats.
Finally, the reading estimates that since people will use more pesticides to protect crops from insects and pests, those toxic pesticides will be the part of the food chain in which the bird survive. As a result, a large portion of birds will vanish from this word. The professor, on the other hand, states that author's prediction is not correct, and claims that no such thing will occur in future because people will not use traditional poisonous elements in that time. He also mentions that people will use less toxic chemical to control insects, and they might start to grow pest-resistant crops. As a result, pest resistant trees will not be the responsibility of vanishing birds population.
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 73
- Integrated writing - TPO 19 76
- TPO-23 Integrated WritingPopulations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this 73
- TPO-28 Integrated WritingRobert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an 80
- TPO-25 Integrated WritingIn 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surr 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d population will continuously decrease in future, and he establishes his point by provid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'alternates'' or 'alternate's'?
Suggestion: alternates'; alternate's
...ees the authors points and provides the alternates explanation of those rationales. Firs...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he birds will not get the place to live in future. This point is challenged by the profes...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 5.04856512141 416% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05833333333 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70533166995 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8224050343 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8125 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480996077613 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167235305267 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102273999735 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308427989593 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463289938864 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.