TPO 2
Both the reading and the listening discuss whether team working is beneficial or not. The author describes that there are three main reasons to support the idea that working people in a group has several advantages. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and brings up three reasons and elucidates some evidence in order to refute what is mentioned in the reading passage.
First of all, the writer states that a group of people is skilful enough to deal well with the problems, due to the fact that a variety of knowledge and experience are provided. Nevertheless, the professor points out that in the teamwork there are some people that who are free riders and they get benefit from being in the group. As a matter of fact, some people in the group have good insights into issues, and as a whole, no name is distinguished from others and individuals who have a real contribution to the projects feel opposite to the reading.
Second, the author argues that group can work quickly, owing to the fact that the tasks are assigned to the members. While the lecturer brings up the idea that it takes too long to reach a consensus on the different issues. To be more specific, many meetings must be held so as to help the group to build an agreement. Furthermore, always one or two individuals manage the meetings and they are very influential than other members, therefore other members strive to convince others to be in agreement with those powerful individuals, which in this case the project continues in the way that some few people want and they ignore the others opinions.
Third, the author argues that participating in the group process provide a situation for the members to have more chance to shine. However, the speaker posits that some influential individuals make the important decisions and do not pay attention to the rest of the group but if the group failed, blame is placed to all of the members of the group.
Therefore, the points in the reading do not make sense.
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 80
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 81
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the tasks are assigned to the members. While the lecturer brings up the idea that it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...re specific, many meetings must be held so as to help the group to build an agreement. F...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...if the group failed, blame is placed to all of the members of the group. Therefore, the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, as to, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73850574713 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55335940923 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5015218428 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.