TPO 20
In this set of materials the reading passage argue about the damage that caused by fire and listen to the let it burn idea, and listening passage talk about some extra proof that show the let it burn can be a good idea.
The reading passage explain some evidence that show the let it burn idea sometimes not work and cause a lot of damage in peoples lives and even in animals and plant lives. Unlike the natural forest fires, “let it burn” policy in the yellowstone cause some damage. First it damge to the vegetation and trees and scorched one third of the park. Second beside the vegetation fire damage to the wild life and some of the small animal unable to scape and burned. third the local businesses that depend on park visitors and now they lost one of the important touristic parks
The listening passage explain about that the let it burn policy is good idea. The passage talk about evidence that show the burning in the yellowstone park don’t make serious damage. Firs the small vegetation can replaced with the trees and make diversity of vegetation in their place. And burning of the park don’t damage the whole the vegetation and animals and the local businesses van improve again.
To sum it all up, by taking all the details into consideration , reading passage assert that let it burn policy don’t work all the time, but the ;listening passage believe that the let it burn policy is good idea and the vegetation can be diverse again and replace the trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- Tpo 25Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- TPO-25 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career job would lead to a secure, successful future. (TPO39-Task2) 60
- TPO 42 independent writing 3
- Essay topics: TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st fires, 'let it burn' policy in the yellowstone cause some damage. Fi...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tation fire damage to the wild life and some of the small animal unable to scape and burned...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...mall animal unable to scape and burned. third the local businesses that depend on par...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one of the important touristic parks The listening passage explain about that...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... local businesses van improve again. To sum it all up, by taking all the deta...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aking all the details into consideration , reading passage assert that let it burn...
^^
Line 11, column 147, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...olicy don't work all the time, but the ;listening passage believe that the let i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75285171103 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31539493802 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444866920152 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4541292347 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261821015969 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128692308793 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502585802409 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175856507178 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811452949227 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.