TPO 20
The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about “let it burn policy”. With this mind, the passage believes that it is not a good procedure to quench the fire in jungles and provides three disadvantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, categorically refutes all three disadvantages mentioned in the passage, citing that all advantages are uncertain.
First, both the text and the talk discuss declined vegetation diversity after the fire. In this line of thought, the author claims that fire and high temperature of it cause to annihilate big and small trees. Conversely, the lecturer points out that it is unlikely if a fire destroys old and bulk trees and makes the opportunity for growing new trees. she adds juvenile trees need space and fire removes old and big trees, so can provide this space for new species of trees and vegetation.
Second, both the passage and the lecture put forth the idea of fire can kill big and small animals. In this vein, the author mentions that big animals might be fleeing from the flame but small animals cannot survive from flames, also fire can abolish their habitat and foods. However, the lecturer refutes the idea, believing that fire can increase animal species akin to vegetation. Accordingly, the more new vegetation, the more new habitats, and foods, so small animals like rabbits can live this area and their predators are evolved by these small animals.
Third, both the reading and listening material discuss the idea of tourist economical. While the author maintains that keeping the fire can harm the tourist population, the lecturer opposes this notion. she asserts that making a fire in jungles depends on several factors such as shortage rainfall, drastic dryness and etc. so all of this factor cannot occur in each year. Moreover, a fire occurred in one year and it is a rare phenomenon, so it is cannot decline the tourist population and harm to the economy that depends on tourists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'annihilating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: annihilating
...t fire and high temperature of it cause to annihilate big and small trees. Conversely, the le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... the opportunity for growing new trees. she adds juvenile trees need space and fire...
^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...tion, the lecturer opposes this notion. she asserts that making a fire in jungles d...
^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...h as shortage rainfall, drastic dryness and etc. so all of this factor cannot occur in e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94259818731 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55501259779 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0348511639 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199124773781 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710245678266 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319754417822 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121444847759 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220492988789 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.