TPO21
The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about genetically modified trees. The reading asserts that change and reform the genes' structures can beneficial and provide three reasons to validate this assertion. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on all the reasons provided by the author and presents solid arguments to support her claim.
First, the article points out genetically modified trees can more survive in harsh condition than normal ones and illustrates that by an example about Hawaii modified trees, which can survive from ringspot problem. Albeit, the lecturer argues that the changed gene trees are an abnormal tree that is modified to resist from specific threat, so when these trees are exposed in bad conditions like climate changing, they die and wipe out.
moreover, the reading mentions that the modified trees have many economic benefits because they grow faster and the period of returning invest money is decreased. However, the professor denies this reason by talking about these trees’ seed price. She adds that these trees’ seeds are expensive and companies, which are producing this seed, take more money from farmers for selling these seeds. Also, there is a regulation that asserts that farmers cannot use seeds which are produced by trees and if they want using this seed, they must pay money.
Finally, the author contends that these reformed trees can decrease deforestation because they grow fast and can a replacement for the cutted trees. Conversely, the lecturer disagrees with that and says wild trees can be replaced by the modified trees. moreover, the modified gene trees grow harshly and can be a threat to normal trees, so using these trees makes a competition for these trees and normal trees on natural resources that has a bad impact on the normal trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ate changing, they die and wipe out. moreover, the reading mentions that the modified...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... can be replaced by the modified trees. moreover, the modified gene trees grow harshly a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38507162716 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6309927571 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434296399135 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169988322292 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097194513339 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253549175713 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10481637393 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.