TPO 20 integrated writing
In the lecture, the professor explains why forest fires is considered part of the ecological cycle and what are their benefits. This, however, contradicts the reading, which states that there are three major damage caused by the "let it burn" policy.
First, the speaker asserts that fires allow forests or parks to become more diversity because when fire destroys areas covered with big trees, This allows smaller plants to take over and to grow. Also, she mentions that some plant seed species do not germinate unless they exposed to high heat. That's why fire creates the perfect environment for them to grow. This opposes the article, which states that Yellowstone's fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and vegetation.
Second, fires can benefit the animals around it to recover and survive since small plants grow after fires, this creates perfect habitat for small animals like rabbits to thrive and recover. On the other hand, the reading challenges this point by saying that the park wildlife is affected and the destruction of habitats there makes it impossible foe the animal to survive.
Finally, although fires can affect the attraction to the national parks if it happens every year, the Yellowstone did not experience any other fires since 1988. This refutes the text, which states that fires compromise the value of the park and decrease tourist attraction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...inate unless they exposed to high heat. Thats why fire creates the perfect environmen...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding animals'?
Suggestion: the surrounding animals
...etation. Second, fires can benefit the animals around it to recover and survive since small plan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36892257979 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641592920354 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6664480868 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353278731577 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137660214625 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582604653706 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207389262352 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506098634362 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.