tpo 21
Both of the reading and lecture are about genetic modification. As a matter a fact you can manipulate the organism's genes. For example a tree can produce more profit through fast growth, more fruits and so on. The reading provides three reasons that this occurrence can be advantageous and then supports them. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all reasons dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that these genetic modified trees are rigid and hard in compared with natural trees. Like a tree in Hawaii that its gene has been altered and it is resistant to a virus that harms to its ring spot. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She points out natural trees have adapted to be resistant in any circumstance like changing weather, attacking any species of insects and so on. The professor elaborates on this by mentioning that changed trees have been planned just for specific condition and in other cases of natural disasters, they can wipe up.
Second, the reading contends that modified trees can provides some advantages in economic fields because they will be able to grow faster and produce more fruits. This point is rebutted by the lecturer. She claims that this approach is too costly. On the one hand, companies have to charge a great number of farmers; on the other hand, for collecting seeds or planting new modified trees by law, people have to pay much money to companies.
Finally, the article proposes that this method will be effect for protecting environment. Since the demand for wood has been increased by people in the world; hence, we can avoid cutting down natural trees; conversely, the professor refutes this suggestion. The lecturer believes that altered trees grow aggressively; consequently, they can create limitation for natural trees because they will compete for soil, water even sun light with non-modified trees; subsequently it can create negative effects.
- TPO 1 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and ex 75
- Tpo 45 3
- do you agree or disagree?teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. 72
- do you agree or disagree? working near a relative can be effective. 76
- Do you agree or disagree? to improve the quality of education, the universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lecture are about genetic modification. As a matter a fact you can manipulate the ...
^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
... a matter a fact you can manipulate the organisms genes. For example a tree can produce m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all reasons dubious. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, then, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07384615385 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59099213366 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.2448362078 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6111111111 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408431061354 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105605312558 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834168805867 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244526157749 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460610745924 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.