The reading and lecture both discuss the idea of planting genetically modified trees benefits. While the reading states three advantages of genetically modified trees, the professor refutes, by saying that there are three problems associated to these modified trees.
Firstly, the reading avers that the genetically modified trees are designed to be stronger than nature tress. So, they can survive much better than the natural trees. However, the professor argues this notion by saying that the modified trees are designed to be resistant to one specific condition like climate changes or insect's pasties resistant. So, some individual species will be able to survive, but the genetically modified trees are more uniform. As a result, if they are not designed to be resistant to specific condition, all of them most likely to die with any change. So, they will wiped out.
In addition, the article mentions that these specific trees will provide the farmers with more economic benefits. This is because they will grow faster. So, the farmers will have plenty of yields. On the other hand, the professor questions this idea by pointing out that the modified trees have hidden cost. As, the company will charge the farmers more fee to buy these seeds. Moreover, these companies will ask for charge every time the farmers want to plant the modified threes.
Finally, the reading shows that the genetically modified trees will protect the wild trees from over cuts because they will satisfy the need for wood. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by saying that the modified trees will cause local damage. In addition, they will plant among the natural trees. Consequently, the genetically trees will compete with the natural trees about the natural resources as sunlight, soils, and nutrients. As a result, many natural trees will get affected.
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 3
- TPO 28 Integrated Writing Task 43
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'wipe'
Suggestion: wipe
...y to die with any change. So, they will wiped out. In addition, the article mentio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...at the modified trees have hidden cost. As, the company will charge the farmers mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24414715719 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45450773595 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494983277592 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9058423412 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5263157895 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411921611696 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148525335288 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877281227829 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275471658444 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638398513659 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.