TPO 22
The author believes that ethanol, which is a fuel made from corn and sugar cane, is not a good alternative to gasoline. The lecturer, however, has the opposite point of view. He explains why the author is not right about his points.
First, the author asserts that using ethanol contributes to global warming in the same way that gasoline does. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that plants from which the ethanol is produced, fight global warming by absorbing carbon dioxide from the environment.
Second, the author contends that using plants for ethanol production, prevents them from being used for other purposes such as feeding animals. On the other hand, the lecturer states that ethanol can be produced from plant parts which are not consumed by animals, therefore, it does not affect their food.
Finally, the author postulates that prices of the ethanol cannot compete with that of the gasoline in the near future providing that it depends highly on governmental subsidies. The lecturer accepts the claim about subsidies, but in contrast, he suggests that promotion of ethanol use not only leads to its massive production, but also diminishes its price in the long haul.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- TPO 28 78
- TPO 24 78
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree Some people believe that video games could inspire young students interest and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and a waste of time so young students should be allowed to play video games 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11794871795 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48315296593 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605128205128 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0762449597 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.888888889 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6666666667 7.06452816374 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37511922155 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148016072855 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899330301871 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215068842268 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585892225163 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.