tpo 23
yellow tree cedar
The reading and the lecture both discuss the possible hypothesis behind the declination of yellow cedar trees. While the reading passage explains three hypothesis of reducing the number of yellow cedar trees, the lecture, However, challenges each of the hypothesis and states it is unfortunate that we do not know exactly what is killing these trees. And none of the explanations provided in the passage is adequate.
The first point that the listening makes to cast doubt on the reading passage is that the yellow cedar is more resistant for infestation by insects like cedar bark beetle. According to the professor, the yellow cedar tree produces powerful chemicals that are poisonous for cedar bark beetle and other insects. This point from the lecture argues with the reading because the passage only states that one of the reasons behind reducing the number of yellow cedar is parasitic attacks by the cedar bark beetle.
Another point that the lecturer makes to contend the writer's hypothesis is that brown bears numbers are declining in coastal islands where the yellow cedar trees are growing. Furthermore, the professor explains since the cedar trees are reducing in number with or without the presence of bears, therefore, the bears are unlikely the cause of yellow cedar inclination. However, the reading passage asserts that brown bears aggressive clawing and eating behavior on yellow cedar trees is one of the reasons for trees declination.
Finally, the speaker states that yellow trees die in low elevation when the temperature is warm more than in much colder and freeing high elevations. In addition, the professor explains that the growing roots are not likely to suffer deterioration from freezing or cold weather. On the contrary, the reading states that a gradual change in climate has weakened the root system of the yellow trees and initiate the tree growth in winter rather than spring. Gowing in such freezing weather will demolish the health of the whole tree.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | hhzz | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 70 | view |
- Some undergraduate students follow a course of study designated to develop general knowledge and reasoning ability. Other follow the course of study to learn specific skills with practical application 73
- Technology has made children less creative than before 81
- The reading and the lecture both discuss whether dinosaurs were endothermal mammals or not. While the reading states that are three significant evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms, the lecture of the other hand refutes each of the evidence provided in 81
- tpo 30 burning mirrors weapon 80
- tpo 30 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...hile the reading passage explains three hypothesis of reducing the number of yellow cedar ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... that the lecturer makes to contend the writers hypothesis is that brown bears numbers ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bears'' or 'bear's'?
Suggestion: bears'; bear's
...nd the writers hypothesis is that brown bears numbers are declining in coastal island...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18209876543 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47569152853 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0145388567 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.153846154 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40670633017 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159897938451 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712219109759 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252045508728 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549663188378 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.