TPO 24
The lecture and the reading discuss actual animal tissues that remain from Tyrannosaurus rex about 70-million-years-old. Although the passage claims that some soft tissue such as blood vessels, red blood cells and collagen found on the legs bond of fossils, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that finding many small branching channels in the leg bone that show blood vessels. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that these soft flexible bone channels are not blood vessels. They would remain from other animals and bacteria. After animals died, some bacteria started to live in bones, and they made colonize hollows in bone; so, these branching channels only some trace that remains from colonizing of bacteria.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that some spheres particle would remain of red blood cells, the professor argues that these reddish spheres have been found in the fossils of the animal which we know that did not have any red blood cells. So, they do not necessarily remain of blood cells, and he adds that they could be some pieces of reddish minerals.
Finally, although the reading passage says that some Collagens are found in dinosaur leg bone, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that Collagens only can live 1000 years old; hence, it cannot remain for 70-million-years. These Collagens may remain from another source like human skin. When researchers want to carry these fossils, some Collagens may remain on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'spheres'' or 'sphere's'?
Suggestion: spheres'; sphere's
...like the passage which states that some spheres particle would remain of red blood cell...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, may, so, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34782608696 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53951877085 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561264822134 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3952602112 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381935479109 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150751744839 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542983294043 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234301934316 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03212463916 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.