TPO. 24-integrated writing task
The author states the discoveries of the material on the Tyrannosaurus rex bone, which scientists think that these are the remains of blood vessels, red blood cells and collagen matrix. As opposed to, the lecturer who counters-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that none of these three discoveries seems to be convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentioned that the fossils of leg bone revealed many small branching channels inside, which probably correspond to hollows in the bones where blood vessels were once located. Therefore, this soft substance may very well represent the remains of real blood vessels. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that these hollow might have been created by colonized bacteria that are decomposed after the animals death.
The second argument the author gives is that the microscopic examination of the inner bone revealed the presence of spheres that could be the remains of red blood cells. Apart from that, the test showed that the size of the sphere was about the same with the red blood cells. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that these spheres are found in other animals too. Consequently, if it appears that other organisms contain these mineral, it means that the origin comes from different part.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that the scientists found that the leg bone contained collagen. Nevertheless, the lecturer declares that collagen cannot be seen in fossils that are 70 million year old because it does not last that long. Therefore, this is not a convincing point.
- Tpo 36 3
- Do you agree with the statement that teachers have had more value in the past than today 73
- TPO 39- Integrated Writing Task 3
- Uniforms Vs non-Uniforms 68
- There has been discussion about the noises that sailors Russian submarines have heard during their patrolletion on the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The lecturer argues that the theories that are mentioned by author are not true. While, the author cont 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... bacteria that are decomposed after the animals death. The second argument the autho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2277992278 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58486062484 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8756924605 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0828941672008 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231263174628 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403350733907 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468771070353 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276677022442 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.