TPO 26
The author believes that zerba mussel, which is native to Eastern Europe, will soon be spreaded to North America in which it poses a threat to freshwater fish species, and cessation of its population growth is not possible. The lecturer, however, has the opposite point of view. He explains why the author is not right about his points.
First, the author states that zebra mussels are transfered to America using "ballast water" of ships with which ships balance their cargo. For this reason they will soon dominate the area. On the otherhand, the lecturer counters the author's claim by asserting that zebra mussels are killed in salt water, thus, if ships release their "ballast water" in the ocean no zebra mussels will be moved to fresh waters of North America.
Second, the author claims that not only zebra mussels are durable species and have high rates of reproduction but they also have no predators in their new habitat. Therefore, they are likely to dominate their new habitat. The lecturer, refutes this argument by proposing that after some time, birds are likely to indentify zebra mussels as a consumable species, just like they did in Europe, and they will start consuming them in large numbers.
Finally, the author contends that zebra mussels will compete with fish species whose food is planktons, providing that they are also plankton eaters. On the contrary, the lecturer opposes author's contention by arguing that although zebra mussels will compete with plankton eating fish species, they produce nutrients which will help bottom eating fish species thrive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | Apolytos | 85 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | zaid | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | DarkSaitama | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-26 | marathon24h | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their political and social views known to students in the classroom. 71
- TPO 16 - Integrated 81
- TPO 22 76
- TPO 25 81
- Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42455671746 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5496672867 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.818181818 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513679514479 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191649276047 0.0996497079465 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104842932206 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294088223674 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488049781732 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.