tpo 28
The assignment states that Robert Peary's claims about reaching the north pole during the the first years of 20th century is true. However the lecturer contradicts this idea, bringing up three reasons vindicating her standpoint.
First, the reading states that the national geographic society set up a group of people specialized in this matter, in order to examine the truth of Peary's claims. And the results illustrate that he had reached the north pole. On the contrary, the lecturer oppses this reason by stating that the set up jury was consisted of some peary's friends who have mutual positive ideas about his claim, so it couldn't be a fair judgement. And also the investigation period takes only 2 days which is a short time for checking all the evidence. This demonstrates that the national geographic investigation is not trustworthy.
Secondly, the assignment accailms that another explorer has recently made it to north pole in the same conditions such as speed and journey duration. And that proves the peary's statement. In contrast the lecturer dismisses this idea buy asserting that not all of the conditions are the same. She says that conditions like weather and cargo weight are not the same in this two journeys which makes this comparison and its' results look nonsense.
The last, but not the least, the article declares that the truth can be inferred from the photographs taken by peary by measuring the shadows and locating sun's position. However the lecturer refutes this idea by claiming that the photos are too old and since finding sun's location from photos need high resolution images with accurate shadow boundaries, the faded and blurred images can't play role as hard evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ms about reaching the north pole during the the first years of 20th century is true. Ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ms about reaching the north pole during the the first years of 20th century is true. Ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...he first years of 20th century is true. However the lecturer contradicts this idea, bri...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...l positive ideas about his claim, so it couldnt be a fair judgement. And also the inves...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...nd that proves the pearys statement. In contrast the lecturer dismisses this idea buy as...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...ntrast the lecturer dismisses this idea buy asserting that not all of the condition...
^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...misses this idea buy asserting that not all of the conditions are the same. She says that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...the shadows and locating suns position. However the lecturer refutes this idea by claim...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...oundaries, the faded and blurred images cant play role as hard evidence.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06382978723 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58449097151 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3345927948 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347291553545 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120484618608 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874424328209 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195909113115 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654934900755 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.